mathjak107
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Messages
- 6,205
one of my favorite authors harry browne recently passed away.harry was the creator of the "permanent portfolio"..
he would simply divide all the serious money into 4 piles..25% in treasury bills,25% in the most diversified fully invested as a policy mutual funds,30 year treasuries and gold bullion and coins...the idea was each pile would respond very strongly to each of the economic cycles and although each one was so volitile on its own that it would be considered a speculation on its own,each catagory could only go to zero under horrific conditions for that asset class while other offetting asset classes could double triple or go 100x if economic events warranted it...a simple balance once a year and that was it....with the out look for the future so iffy im wondering if harrys advice might be right on....i had tried this 20 years ago and found it not only boring but the heavy gold weight dragged the performance down.....although my return was still positive thru the crash of 1987 from following it.........in fact with 1 exception down 2% the mix was positive every year although no year was very good in comparison to my more conventional mix...........so heres the question ,how would you adopt and alter harrys bullet-proof plan...i think i would knock gold down to say 10-12% instead of a 25% stake as he figured..........getting closer to er im getting more and more gun shy of big drops with years to come back.....
he would simply divide all the serious money into 4 piles..25% in treasury bills,25% in the most diversified fully invested as a policy mutual funds,30 year treasuries and gold bullion and coins...the idea was each pile would respond very strongly to each of the economic cycles and although each one was so volitile on its own that it would be considered a speculation on its own,each catagory could only go to zero under horrific conditions for that asset class while other offetting asset classes could double triple or go 100x if economic events warranted it...a simple balance once a year and that was it....with the out look for the future so iffy im wondering if harrys advice might be right on....i had tried this 20 years ago and found it not only boring but the heavy gold weight dragged the performance down.....although my return was still positive thru the crash of 1987 from following it.........in fact with 1 exception down 2% the mix was positive every year although no year was very good in comparison to my more conventional mix...........so heres the question ,how would you adopt and alter harrys bullet-proof plan...i think i would knock gold down to say 10-12% instead of a 25% stake as he figured..........getting closer to er im getting more and more gun shy of big drops with years to come back.....