ShokWaveRider
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
No!
Let's see if I can explain it another way. For each item you buy an extended warranty for, you are betting the insurance company that it will fail, and cost more to fix than the premium.
The insurance company, of course, knows the failure rate and always wins, even if you happen to be the "lucky" one who has an expensive failure.
Now look at all the things you buy. You should take the same bet the insurance company does; that even if some fail, most will not. You will come out ahead if you never buy any warranty.
What about buying insurance just for those things you expect to fail? Still no. The repair costs should be priced into the cost of ownership. I replaced the transmission in my truck. Not cheap, but it was a LOT cheaper than if I'd bought extended warranties for every used vehicle I've ever owned. If you can't afford to fix it when it breaks, you shouldn't buy it. Or at least factor that into the price you're willing to pay for it.
I think you bring up a good point. If the payment results in priority service, fast turn around work, with them handling all the details, then it may be a useful service. There are a few service-plan kind of warranties that actually work well this way. Yours sounds like one of them.
However, if it results in no priority, and if they put you through the wringer to justify the service, then what's the value?
Exactly.... As a philosophy I self insure for affordable risks, as I wish to keep that profit for myself. ...