CardsFan
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
And yet, with all this water, CA will suffer a water shortage soon, because there is not enough storage capacity, no matter what the precipitation.
Before calling the design of the main spillway a failure, let's see why it failed (despite having handled higher flow rates in the past). It sounds like maintenance, rather than design, may very well be the issue with that.The sad fact is that for this not-unprecedented high-precipitation event, the dam design was a failure. The main spillway could not handle outflows well within range. The emergency spillway basically couldn't handle anything.
Very good point. My emotions got the best of me. You are absolutely right.Before calling the design of the main spillway a failure, let's see why it failed (despite having handled higher flow rates in the past). It sounds like maintenance, rather than design, may very well be the issue with that.
I do agree that the emergency spillway appears to have been "insufficiently robust." In 2005 several groups requested federal funds ($100 million) to line the emergency spillway with concrete, but that was rejected by federal regulators.
I read the wiki for Oroville. It was nicknamed "the dam that talks" due to the embedded sensors that are supposed to provide feedback on the structure but I guess they didn't include the spillway in the feedback loop. I agree it's way too soon to say what caused this problem but I'll bet it's a combination of things. Kudos to the design of the main structure (AFIK).
I heard that the Oroville dam is supposed to be part of a overall project that included another dam down stream from it. The one dam was never meant to be the only dam controlling the river. However the other dam was never built for money and environmental reasons.
Any truth to that?