Alex
Full time employment: Posting here.
- Joined
- May 29, 2006
- Messages
- 696
Thanks for your reply, I appreciate your candor. It is especially nice to have a civilized discussion without being insulted by an arrogant, overbearing, 'forum' bully. Especially when the bully has serious anger issues and a propensity for one word replies like - Hairball! ( maybe he has one in his throat?) Does this forum have an 'Ignore' feature?Nords said:Dude, I'm just not keeping up. Let me consolidate your comments & questions into one post:Yes, your tax dollars at work. Data provided for taxes is probably pretty accurate, but surveys are usually crap whether they're paid for by the govt or by TH's former employer.
Yes, I think so. I enjoy writing. I think the personal info provides credibility, although I "went public" to deal with a particularly antagonistic poster.
Asking & responding to questions on this forum forces me to organize my thoughts, figure out what I'm doing & why, and understand it well enough to explain it to someone else without inviting comments like "Hairball!"
If filling in survey ovals with #2 pencils or blue-black ink makes other people feel happy & fulfilled, kindly send me names & addresses and I'll send them my surveys.
Nope. I wouldn't be surprised either, but I'd be a lot more confident in the quality of the data.
At any rate, I agree that the Census data is far from perfect - but it is close enough for government work (pun intended..haha) and as reliable as anything else that the Gov't puts out. I believe that if we were to compare the gov't data to private sources (if we could find them) the numbers would be comparable.
That being said, I still maintain that all real estate is local. Some areas will be more effected than others and some won't be touched at all. A nice home in a popular area with good schools, plentiful jobs, and low crime is always going to be valuable. In ten years we will all be wishing we could of bought at today's prices. It is and always will be about location.