CFB you are a brave man. I don't even want to lend friends and family money no less someone on the internet. Buy hey, whatever works I guess.
cute fuzzy bunny said:Yeah, its a lot more risk, but consider it against renting a property. Lot of risks there too.
But my take is "What else is there?". Aside from the stock market, nothing else really is paying in reasonable compensation for the assumed risk. I do feel like we're being herded out of safer investment options due to the low interest rate environment. Maybe thats to make it easier to fleece us of whats left of our money. I need some income, and so far this looks like a good way to generate some.
A combination of Wellesley and LBYM won't work out for you?
Guess that approach isn't your style, but several of us are perfectly happy using it. I am thinking that perhaps as you grow older it might have greater appeal.
You may have the timing ability I lack. Or it could have been luck in the past. I seem to recall you were kind of wishing you had followed the moving average technique in 2008. But maybe my memory is faulty there....(snip)...
Investing wise, I ducked that 20% drop last year, selling in july and buying back in in august. I'm feeling a little concerned with the way things look right now, as any time we seem to get near S&P 1600 we crash back below 1000 soon after, the situation in europe still looks crappy, and we've all decided to not "pay our bills" here in the US, hoping that all the bad stuff will just go away. I don't think it'll heal on its own and I don't think avoiding the 800lb gorilla thats still hanging around is a good idea. So I may check out of the market again soon...just looking for another 100 points or so on the S&P. Sadly except for stocks and the LC deal, you can't make money right now.
...
Yeah, its a lot more risk, but consider it against renting a property. Lot of risks there too.
But my take is "What else is there?". Aside from the stock market, nothing else really is paying in reasonable compensation for the assumed risk. I do feel like we're being herded out of safer investment options due to the low interest rate environment. Maybe thats to make it easier to fleece us of whats left of our money. I need some income, and so far this looks like a good way to generate some.
You may have the timing ability I lack. Or it could have been luck in the past. I seem to recall you were kind of wishing you had followed the moving average technique in 2008. But maybe my memory is faulty there.
I don't have any idea how far this market will go. I'd just consider that we could be in another 1980's type market and be optimistic. So far this market has had about the same rise as the 1980's one. But then again, history does not repeat. If I sold it would be because of very specific conditions that have occurred in the past, some combo of (1) inverted yield curve, (2) excess valuations as measured by PE10 when adjusted for recent decade's wide swings in earnings, and (3) SP500 gains in last 12 months much lower then short Treasury bonds.
Well, if you're going to take more risk for your income then you'd hope to be properly compensated for that risk-- otherwise it's just chasing yield.Yeah, its a lot more risk, but consider it against renting a property. Lot of risks there too.
But my take is "What else is there?". Aside from the stock market, nothing else really is paying in reasonable compensation for the assumed risk. I do feel like we're being herded out of safer investment options due to the low interest rate environment. Maybe thats to make it easier to fleece us of whats left of our money. I need some income, and so far this looks like a good way to generate some.
I guess it'd be good to know how Wellesley fared the last time bond yields were this low and inflation followed. You'd hope that they'd be at least as diversified as us average retail investors.Yep, I've got plenty of dividend payers, but the bond market pays next to nothing and I imagine it'll get clobbered if and when interest rates do get raised. That makes wellesley less appealing.
Maybe a boring dividend-paying mutual fund or ETF could also fill that diversification role. Clif's mentioned several times that even during 2008-09 when dividends were being cut like crazy, his overall dividend income only dropped 10%. I can't tell if Lending Club's borrowers would continue to repay 90% of their loans if the economy turned foul.Now I need income, and diversification.
Well, if you're going to take more risk for your income then you'd hope to be properly compensated for that risk-- otherwise it's just chasing yield.
I guess it'd be good to know how Wellesley fared the last time bond yields were this low and inflation followed. You'd hope that they'd be at least as diversified as us average retail investors.
Maybe a boring dividend-paying mutual fund or ETF could also fill that diversification role. Clif's mentioned several times that even during 2008-09 when dividends were being cut like crazy, his overall dividend income only dropped 10%. I can't tell if Lending Club's borrowers would continue to repay 90% of their loans if the economy turned foul.
The problem with high-return funds like Lending Club is that it takes a fairly large asset allocation to move the needle, yet it's considered very risky/concentrated to buy into a large asset allocation.
I admit, I haven't looked. With rates running near zero for years, and sure to go up, the bond market can't help but be spanked when that happens. Low yields, almost certain chance of capital reduction...eh...whats to like?
CFB, why can you not deduct losses
Or are they offset with interest earned?
One of the thingsthat worries me about Lending Club and its ilk (which I personally would not touch with the 10 foot pole of your choosing, but different strokes) is that things are likely to become extremely messy if the sponsor (Lending Club, etc.) goes belly up. These are all start-up type organizations, so that is a non-trivial risk.
I'm not sure why, but the losses just go poof. You cant deduct them or subtract them from the interest earned. And its ordinary income.
Where did you learn that they went poofFrom what I know about the tax code (and I admit that I was a tax accountant a LONG time ago), you could deduct losses on money lent as long as it was a legit loan... and a loan to a third party where there are collection attempts seem to fit that bill...
Yes, once the loans are officially "charged off", then its a loss against the income. But they might bounce in and out of 'late' if there are occasional or partial payments and take quite some time to reach a charged off state. They'll also try to establish a payment plan, which might extend the loan well past the 3 or 5 year original term. So...eventually I'd be able to deduct the loss, just not until its completely written off, even though its obvious thats going to happen.
I have only one note that charged off, and frankly I'm miffed about it. The loan was for $12k, I had a $25 slice of that, and the borrower declared chapter 7 bankruptcy 2 months later. Seems like fraud to me, but they wrote it off as "not worth pursuing". Eh, it only cost me $25 to learn what happens when that occurs!
OK, so I guess you are miffed that a bank can take a charge for possible loan losses, but you cannot until it actually is charged off... makes sense to me... but I think that is more of being an accrual basis vs cash basis...
I guess if you need to book the loss, you can sell it...
I thought, you would not need to refile at all, just include it in your income in the year it was received?Its real fun if you take the loss and then later they come back and pay on the loan to clean up their credit. I'd have to refile for the year where the loss was taken.
Recovery of a bad debt. If you deducted a bad debt and in a later tax year you recover (collect) all or part of it, you may have to include the amount you recover in your gross income. However, you can exclude from gross income the amount recovered up to the amount of the deduction that did not reduce your tax in the year deducted. See Recoveries in Publication 525.