wabmester
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2003
- Messages
- 4,459
This is a follow-up to an earlier thread on nutrition and the low-carb craze.
For background, your lipid profile is considered the single best predictor for your risk of coronary heart disease. Other important factors are smoking and being overweight, but serum lipid levels are universally a better predictor than either.
My total cholesterol has always been under 200, which for a long time was considered "OK". But these days, there's a lot more emphasis on the lipid components, specifically the ratio of good to bad cholesterol, and more recently studies have narrowed the definition of "bad" to low-density lipids with small partical size.
At my most recent checkup in June, my new doc was younger and more up-to-date on CHD/diet research than my previous doc, and he recommended a low-carb diet to address my wacky lipid profile.
Here are the results:
June (before diet)
LDL 93 (target < 130, < 100 is good)
HDL 29 (target > 40, > 60 is good)
TriG 362 (target < 150)
Total 194 (target < 200)
Ratio 6.69 (target < 5, < 3 is good)
My diet up to this point had been pretty low-fat. Notice that my total cholesterol is OK, and my LDL is fine, but my HDL is low, my TriG is high, and my ratio is rediculously high. This possibly indicates an early stage of insulin resistence.
Normally, the liver balances the production of HDL and triglycerides in response to spikes in carb intake, but my carb intake is just one *long* spike, so I'm cranking out triglycerides day and night and making very little HDL.
At this point, I switched to a low-carb, high-protein, high-fat diet. Here's my next lipid profile:
July
LDL 130
HDL 32
TriG 125
Total 192
Ratio 6.0
My LDL is up, but anything under 130 is considered OK. HDL is up, TriG are way down (normal for the first time I can recall), and my ratio is coming down.
Phase II is to maintain the same low-carb diet and supplement with Niacin. The doc wants me to get up to 1000 mg/day, which is on the low-end of what studies have shown can raise HDL. Since I don't really understand how high doses of niacin act, I whimp out and eat only about 400-600 mg/day.
Got the results today:
LDL 131
HDL 38
TriG 127
Total 195
Ratio 5.13
So, the bottom line is that my lipid profile has improved quite a bit. I'm almost normal now. And I have taken the easiest approach I can think of: no exercise, no drugs, eat like crazy, and pop a couple of niacin tabs ocassionally.
For the next phase, I plan to reintroduce exercise and reduce my fat intake a bit. There's still plenty of room for improvement, but I'm trying to vary the parameters individually to see what works best for me.
For background, your lipid profile is considered the single best predictor for your risk of coronary heart disease. Other important factors are smoking and being overweight, but serum lipid levels are universally a better predictor than either.
My total cholesterol has always been under 200, which for a long time was considered "OK". But these days, there's a lot more emphasis on the lipid components, specifically the ratio of good to bad cholesterol, and more recently studies have narrowed the definition of "bad" to low-density lipids with small partical size.
At my most recent checkup in June, my new doc was younger and more up-to-date on CHD/diet research than my previous doc, and he recommended a low-carb diet to address my wacky lipid profile.
Here are the results:
June (before diet)
LDL 93 (target < 130, < 100 is good)
HDL 29 (target > 40, > 60 is good)
TriG 362 (target < 150)
Total 194 (target < 200)
Ratio 6.69 (target < 5, < 3 is good)
My diet up to this point had been pretty low-fat. Notice that my total cholesterol is OK, and my LDL is fine, but my HDL is low, my TriG is high, and my ratio is rediculously high. This possibly indicates an early stage of insulin resistence.
Normally, the liver balances the production of HDL and triglycerides in response to spikes in carb intake, but my carb intake is just one *long* spike, so I'm cranking out triglycerides day and night and making very little HDL.
At this point, I switched to a low-carb, high-protein, high-fat diet. Here's my next lipid profile:
July
LDL 130
HDL 32
TriG 125
Total 192
Ratio 6.0
My LDL is up, but anything under 130 is considered OK. HDL is up, TriG are way down (normal for the first time I can recall), and my ratio is coming down.
Phase II is to maintain the same low-carb diet and supplement with Niacin. The doc wants me to get up to 1000 mg/day, which is on the low-end of what studies have shown can raise HDL. Since I don't really understand how high doses of niacin act, I whimp out and eat only about 400-600 mg/day.
Got the results today:
LDL 131
HDL 38
TriG 127
Total 195
Ratio 5.13
So, the bottom line is that my lipid profile has improved quite a bit. I'm almost normal now. And I have taken the easiest approach I can think of: no exercise, no drugs, eat like crazy, and pop a couple of niacin tabs ocassionally.
For the next phase, I plan to reintroduce exercise and reduce my fat intake a bit. There's still plenty of room for improvement, but I'm trying to vary the parameters individually to see what works best for me.