second_act_at_42
Dryer sheet wannabe
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Messages
- 19
Updating the timeline in Firecalc to 30 yrs also yields 100% - just with different low-mean-max ending scenario(s).
Or to make it feel less significant, take the value of the vesting stock and divide by 300 (Rule of 25 times 12 months per year) to see if that increase in monthly income for the rest of one's life is worth it. Probably not worth it looking at it this way.
...
Another thing to look at is your language - both written here and in your head. I see sort of three states that people end up in:
1. Questioning state. This is where OP is now. Is it worth it? Should I stay or should I go? These people end up eventually in one of the other two states below. After a re-read of the OP, it seems like they're leaning towards state #2, but more info would be needed.
2. Want to retire state. People will write things like "I'm pretty sure I have enough. If things turn south, I could turn on my pension or SS. Or get a job. Or cut expenses. We could figure it out. The job now pretty much blows."
3. Not ready to retire state. People will write things like "What if the market drops? What if the ACA gets overturned? What if I'm bored? I really don't mind my job that much."
Sometimes I think it is simple as paying attention to the language one uses to figure out what the right decision for that person is.
+1 This January my sister in law had passed away at 52. She was healthy and worked for the Stanford, planned to retire at 55 but we never know what is around the corner.I often read about the concern of leaving money on the table. I was more concerned with leaving life on the table. Focus on projected healthy years that are left for sure but never forget there are no guarantees of having any year left. I was grateful I had something many of the forever working high net worth people never have - enough!
+1 This January my sister in law had passed away at 52. She was healthy and worked for the Stanford, planned to retire at 55 but we never know what is around the corner.
+1I often read about the concern of leaving money on the table. I was more concerned with leaving life on the table. Focus on projected healthy years that are left for sure but never forget there are no guarantees of having any year left. I was grateful I had something many of the forever working high net worth people never have - enough!
Updating the timeline in Firecalc to 30 yrs also yields 100% - just with different low-mean-max ending scenario(s).
I often read about the concern of leaving money on the table. I was more concerned with leaving life on the table.
OP can make some reasonable guesses as to the value of the vesting stock and then divide that over six months to see what it adds to the hourly rate, then decide if the hourly rate feels worth it. Maybe it would.
Or to make it feel less significant, take the value of the vesting stock and divide by 300 (Rule of 25 times 12 months per year) to see if that increase in monthly income for the rest of one's life is worth it. Probably not worth it looking at it this way.
...
Another thing to look at is your language - both written here and in your head. I see sort of three states that people end up in:
1. Questioning state. This is where OP is now. Is it worth it? Should I stay or should I go? These people end up eventually in one of the other two states below. After a re-read of the OP, it seems like they're leaning towards state #2, but more info would be needed.
2. Want to retire state. People will write things like "I'm pretty sure I have enough. If things turn south, I could turn on my pension or SS. Or get a job. Or cut expenses. We could figure it out. The job now pretty much blows."
3. Not ready to retire state. People will write things like "What if the market drops? What if the ACA gets overturned? What if I'm bored? I really don't mind my job that much."
Sometimes I think it is simple as paying attention to the language one uses to figure out what the right decision for that person is.
...
Final suggestion: When you do decide to leave, I'd recommend throwing away any paperwork and calculations regarding any unvested stock or options that you left on the table. Once you make it to that point in your career, there will always be money left on the table, and I think doing those calculations after you leave can just lead to largely pointless second guessing and regret. I know I left money on the table but I can't tell you how much, and that's made it easier for me to be happy with where I'm at.
I often read about the concern of leaving money on the table. I was more concerned with leaving life on the table. Focus on projected healthy years that are left for sure but never forget there are no guarantees of having any year left. I was grateful I had something many of the forever working high net worth people never have - enough!
My perspective recently changed..... I retired early at about 53 but now at 61 was thinking about going back to work. Am FI and secure but just recently a former colleague passed away at the ripe young age of 63... he never stopped working, was again single quite wealthy but died alone and to all accounts unhappy.Greetings forum friends!
A while back we reached a milestone - and are essentially FI (barring anything crazy happening with some conservative real estate investments). Funny thing is - I'm still doing really well at mega-corp and am even likely to get a promotion soon (despite feeling like I've been slacking off). This comes with more financial incentives including company stock which vests every 6 months. As such I feel a bit confounded with re: to RE timing.
There are days that I can find ways to tolerate or even enjoy working for mega-corp; but those are few and far between. In discussion with a friend of mine - he asked me "What is 6 months worth to you?" - which I replied that I have no idea. Yet I've been pondering this a LOT the last few weeks. I can easily calculate my 6 month savings rate including stock incentive estimates from mega-corp. But I've interpreted the question to mean:
"What is 6 months of your time worth to you? And is giving that up for mega-corp incentives an equitable exchange?"
Would very much like to hear thoughts from the forum on this. Have any of you taken a crack at this calculation? Looking for perspective.
Cheers!
second_act_@_42
Unless work is immensely gratifying and there is nothing you would rather do, then by all means keep working. But if you have enough money and things you would rather do, with people you would rather be with why no do that. It could all be over before you know it!
I think age place into this as well- I assume by your name that you are 42... This might seem harsh, but I think it place a role.
6 months at 42 - 50% life expectancy left, 6 months is 1/84 or 1% remaining life
6 months at 62 - 25% life expectancy left, 6 months is 1/44 or 2% remaining life
6 months at 82 - 2% life expectancy left, 6 months is 1/4 or 25% remaining life
Greetings forum friends!
A while back we reached a milestone - and are essentially FI (barring anything crazy happening with some conservative real estate investments). Funny thing is - I'm still doing really well at mega-corp and am even likely to get a promotion soon (despite feeling like I've been slacking off). This comes with more financial incentives including company stock which vests every 6 months. As such I feel a bit confounded with re: to RE timing.
There are days that I can find ways to tolerate or even enjoy working for mega-corp; but those are few and far between. In discussion with a friend of mine - he asked me "What is 6 months worth to you?" - which I replied that I have no idea. Yet I've been pondering this a LOT the last few weeks. I can easily calculate my 6 month savings rate including stock incentive estimates from mega-corp. But I've interpreted the question to mean:
"What is 6 months of your time worth to you? And is giving that up for mega-corp incentives an equitable exchange?"
Would very much like to hear thoughts from the forum on this. Have any of you taken a crack at this calculation? Looking for perspective.
Cheers!
second_act_@_42
For me it would take a pretty significant amount of money to add on time at the end of my career rather than just quitting when I know I have enough. It’s a great problem to have if the incentives are there but your life does have a finite amount of time to enjoy.