Success = Education or Experience

Car-Guy

Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
10,950
Location
Texas
I’m having an on-going debate with some “friends” (see debate topic below) and I thought I’d get some opinions from the folks on this forum.


No matter if you are still working or have already retired, do you feel that getting a higher academic education or gaining greater job experience(s) helped you the most in your working career? Or do you consider them equally important? OK, add luck or something else if you like.
 
Why does it need to be one or the other? I think you need a balance of both.

I went to graduate school because it was apparent that at some point in the near future I would be competing for jobs within Mega against peers who had similarly good education, work experience and job performance ratings as I did but also had graduate degrees and if I had not done it I would have been at a competitive disadvantage.

I went to grad school while working (Executive MBA program) and found I was able to quickly put what I was learning at school into practice at work and having an MBA was an important credential in getting the next job I had after I left Mega.
 
It doesn't - see OP above - Or do you consider them equally important?
 
Last edited:
Both. I did MBA at night at a top school for finance and accounting while working in the financial industry and regularly talking to people with 25+ years on the buy side or trading derivative hedges. Best combined learning experience ever, although I am sure I burned a few years off my lifespan doing it.
 
For me it was job experience. I have a master's degree, but it's pretty much useless. My Dad was extremely successful in life (personally and financially) with only a GED. He's one of the smartest men I have ever met.

My in-laws have a several businesses and employ about 75 people...they only graduated high school. Her Dad's best friend was just a 'dumb old roofer' who now owns several banks in Oklahoma and Texas...again, no college degree.

On the other hand, I have dealt with many military officers and aerospace engineers that are dumb as a box of rocks.

So...I tend to give a lot more credence to life experience than to higher education.

Sent from my mobile device so please excuse grammatical errors. :)
 
Both. A degree is also more important as a credential now than it was many years ago. It likely depends on so many factors but in my experience both are important.
 
Last edited:
Both for me. I got my current job with my resume, then I advanced in it with my degree.

I will say that, after teaching college for about 20 years, increasingly I had students who were after the paper, and not there so much to actually learn. That sort of 'education' eventually catches up with you...
 
Without an engineering degree I could never have gotten a job as engineer. However, once you are working it is more important what you do and results of your work. What it really comes down to is what FlyBoy5 said, you have to apply intelligence. Some jobs have an entry barrier that is a degree of some type. Without it, you pretty much are unable to get that job. But you will not succeed or go far without being able to apply the knowledge and learn from the experience. Ability to continue your learning is important and there are many people that career have evolved into something very different than their original degree by OJT and their ability to adapt to new challenges.

In simple terms, I think it is both. Need the degree to get into the higher pay jobs, but then you have to make the most of that experience.
 
I worked as an engineer in an academic work environment. A degree was a minimum requirement to get ahead. After that I would say that I kept my position as long as I did because I became very knowledgable in my field. I did, at one point or another, use just about everything I learned in college. Also, people skills were essential to get ahead as well.
 
The degree, in my field, gets you in the door. What keeps you there is experience (and talent).

My degree was BSEE. Did I ever do electronics engineering - not much. (A few small board layouts - but that was it.) I fell into the niche of embedded programming (writing code that is machine/microprocessor/hardware specific.) That's not something taught very much at universities. I ended up doing a Masters in software engineering and the closest I could get to embedded software in my coursework was a real time programming course (but it assumed big computers, not small circuit boards.)

For me- education got me the first job. Experience got me the next jobs.
 
I think success in many jobs starts with experience but later morphs into education. As the type of work becomes standardized, colleges develop degrees in them and the next generation of employees will need the major to get the job. Which may not really require those degrees. And which degrees could really best be taught by the first wave of workers, but they didn't have degrees so couldn't teach.
 
During the 2nd half of my career I worked as a computer engineer for DOD. One of the big frustrations was having contractors work for us that had all (and more) of the needed technical skills and experience to do the job but because they didn't have the proper degree they couldn't be hired on when a permanent position opened up. Ironically, even though my EE degree was needed to get my job I don't recall ever using anything I learned from my EE studies in my DOD job.
 
Communism - I owe it all to those Commies and their Sputnik.

Degree in Chemistry with emphasis on wood - instead got hired by Boeing - American SST - psst titanium - and on to Skylab, Mars Viking, Space Shuttle and then and then ER.

heh heh heh - stayed grunt engineer and was an overnight thirty year investing success - all praise to compound interest curve, time in the market and index funds aka Bogle's Folly. :dance: :cool:

P.S. Probably should give history a slight nod. :rolleyes: :greetings10:
 
Last edited:
I agree with those who wrote that the education got their feet in the door at the beginning but it was their work experience which made the bigger different later on.

In my field (actuarial/insurance), I made myself indispensible with my combination of education and specialized work experience (able to combine actuarial skills with computer programming expertise) in my division. I could do things that nobody else in my division could do and could do them correctly and usually quickly.

Having this unique combination of skills and expertise not only got me better than average raises (which translated into extra shares of company stock in the ESOP's infancy) but also gave me the leverage to demand a more favorable work arrangement (part-time, sometimes telecommuting) for the last 7 years of my career leading to eventual ER.
 
Education was required to gain entry into the field. Gaining wisdom through experience enabled a long and successful career.
 
I agree both a degree and job experience are important, but I"lol add having the discipline to continue education and learning is just as important Having a degree in a science curriculum was required for me to get hired, but not in any specific field. They then taught me with in-house training what I needed to know to get started. To advance I took additional courses and certificate programs to develop new skills in the IT world and learned what I could on the job. I also got an MBA along the way which helped me more in my investments than it did on the job.
 
Great topic and I agree that both are important, how you weight one against the other depends of number of different factors. One thing that hasn't been mentioned and that is how a person interacts with others. I don't care how much education or work experience one has if they don't have the ability to work with others they will not go far.
 
Perhaps at different times they each play different roles. When assessing an individual's potential to learn and grow, academic achievements are important, as they confirm a broad framework and systemic approach to acquring and building knowledge. On the other hand when judging whether an individual can carry out a new task or responsibility, prior performance and experience dealing with new challenges can show the qualities needed to succeed once again.
 
Both education and experience helped me in my working career. Education helped more in the beginning and experience helped more in the end. My education provided me with the foundation of my career - the base knowledge and ability to figure things out. Experience provided me with a growing stockpile of info that I could rely on to best solve a problem and get the job done.
 
it all depends on the person.......most often an education will open a door. Most mega-corps look, not only at a degree, but a degree from MIT or Harvard will open more doors than most. Then, once you get into the workplace, performance and politics pay off. To me, politally correct, means a person becomes a member of "the team" and is able to work with other members of the team.......many competent, educated folks find themselves at a mega corp where they just don't have enough in common to be accepted by the other members of a team.....really unfortunate. Now, for me, I lack an education because my Dad wanted me to be an engineer....I just couldn't do it.....and wouldn't pay for my general education....so I went and got a sales job, started my own company, built it over the years and made far more than I could have at any mega copr.......that doesn't me me better or worse than those that got an education.....I have kids......all have degrees.....in the fields they wanted.....all paid for by me, happily.....none wanted my business....OK by me.....none will ever make as much money......that's OK too. So, my advice is do what you want....work hard.....get an education.....but if you don't that's not an excuse not to do well. We're all different, we all have options.
 
I haven't read the entire thread, but it would appear that everyone is assuming (for the most part) that you're applying to work for someone else. What about success derived from entrepreneurship?

Quick excerpt from an LA Times article about Andrew Carnegie from 1902:

CARNEGIE'S EPITAPH
Andrew Carnegie's expression of hope that he may die comparatively poor is recalled by his suggestion of an epitaph for his tombstone. In speaking of a famous American inventor he said, recently, "I had no inventive mind, simply a mind to use the inventions of others; I think a fit epitaph for me would be, 'Here lies a man who knew how to get around men much cleverer than himself.'" We hope a long time may elapse before it is necessary to write an epitaph for Mr. Carnegie. He has already done more good, in the distribution of great wealth, than any other man in the world's history. Only a minor part of his money has been bestowed, and he sticks to the declared purpose of getting rid of all of it, substantially, in the same manner. It is also to be hoped that his epitaph, when the time comes to write it, will not be in exact accordance with his suggestion. Probably he does not mean to convey just the idea that occurs to the average reader. Knowledge of "how to get around much cleverer men" is rather suggestive of what in the vernacular we call "sharp practice." It is evident that Mr. Carnegie had no such thought in his mind. A much more appropriate epitaph would be this: "Here lies a man who knew how to utilize the ideas of men' much cleverer than himself."
 
do you feel that getting a higher academic education or gaining greater job experience(s) helped you the most in your working career? Or do you consider them equally important? OK, add luck or something else if you like.

To be perfectly honest, experience helped me the most when it came to working through the day to day issues, technical, interpersonal, company politics, etc. Education was well, academic. Three degrees, business and engineering, earned after already beginning my career were personally satisfying to me to achieve but never really made a huge difference in how I performed my job. They were also an insurance policy to make sure I had a head start in case my job went south, as without them replacing my salary would have been unlikely if starting over from scratch. So I'll put a plug in for "luck" too, as I never needed to start over, and my employer paid tuition covered the "insurance" premiums.
 
Success - Measured by Dollars. Important, but there can be happiness for those of us who failed that criteria.
In two weeks DW and I will enter into our 26th year of being retired, never coming close to being millionaires.
Perhaps a different era. Just out of college, with a service obligation, new bride and soon a child on the way... the lifetime goal was not to become wealthy, but to have a safe future. The idea of ever being in the monied class just didn't exist. The ideal then was a decent salary, a home, car, a stay at home wife and a loving, happy family... (four sons)
Personality and inclusion was a major part of the hopes and dreams. Part of this from the choice of a Liberal Arts education. Leadership, but with little or no interest in business, though DW's dad was a successful businessman, owning a mill in the heyday of the New England textile industry.
With esoteric tastes, and no specialization, the fallback was 30 years in the business of retail management with a reasonable degree of success, but lacking the killer instinct necessary to be top dog.

And so, from different era, a different perspective, a different measure of "Success"... In this case, more a matter of 'Nurture", than "Nature".
Success = Happy and Optimistic...
Twin boys of five or six.
Worried that the boys had developed extreme personalities — one was a total pessimist, the other a total optimist — their parents took them to a psychiatrist.

First the psychiatrist treated the pessimist. Trying to brighten his outlook, the psychiatrist took him to a room piled to the ceiling with brand-new toys. But instead of yelping with delight, the little boy burst into tears. “What’s the matter?” the psychiatrist asked, baffled. “Don’t you want to play with any of the toys?” “Yes,” the little boy bawled, “but if I did I’d only break them.”

Next the psychiatrist treated the optimist. Trying to dampen his out look, the psychiatrist took him to a room piled to the ceiling with horse manure. But instead of wrinkling his nose in disgust, the optimist emitted just the yelp of delight the psychiatrist had been hoping to hear from his brother, the pessimist. Then he clambered to the top of the pile, dropped to his knees, and began gleefully digging out scoop after scoop with his bare hands. “What do you think you’re doing?” the psychiatrist asked, just as baffled by the optimist as he had been by the pessimist. “With all this manure,” the little boy replied, beaming, “there must be a pony in here somewhere!”
 
Both education and experience helped me in my working career. Education helped more in the beginning and experience helped more in the end. My education provided me with the foundation of my career - the base knowledge and ability to figure things out. Experience provided me with a growing stockpile of info that I could rely on to best solve a problem and get the job done.

+1 Advanced engineering degree landed me a good starting job at MegaTechCorp. Education had also taught me how to solve problems and how to adapt to different situations. Experience helped me apply all of that to the real world.
 
I agree with the previous poster about the politics/team player thing. Especially in engineering, where asbergers type personalities are more common than in the general population, there are some brilliant people who manage to piss off the people who could advance their career. I've also been involved in interviews where we decided not to hire the most qualified technical candidate because they were abrasive and would piss off people around them. As a result, I was fortunate to work with a team that avoided the egos, backstabbing, etc - we actually helped each other when we got stuck.... And so our teams productivity was higher than groups that didn't pay as much attention to group dynamics.
 
Back
Top Bottom