rescueme
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Uh - sounds "normal" to me ...(snip)...single men will tend to be the ones who lose?
Uh - sounds "normal" to me ...(snip)...single men will tend to be the ones who lose?
I have to admit some disappointment. After reading the thread title I was expecting to find a thread about a senior sex-for-benefits scandal at the SSA or something about granny porn.
Heck, I was afraid we'd have to pay for it...When I read the title of this thread, I don't think of the same nasty things you pervs think of.
If you have to offer one price irrespective of gender, and you end up selling too many annuities to women (longevity risk increases), how do you adjust your business to bring in more men (shorter life expectancy) to balance out your longevity risk? About the only way is to market heavily in areas that men might see your ads! And even that is not 'guaranteed' to adjust your insurance pool risk. Not really an efficient situation to force the insurers into, IMO.
Heck, I was afraid we'd have to pay for it...
Nords said:If only there was some way for the title of the thread to be changed to "Social Security benefits versus gender"! But, nah, we probably don't have the technology or the labor to make it happen.
Nah, probably not, unless the OP lets us know that he wants it changed, in which case any mod/admin can change it for him. Besides, we are having such fun with the title as is.
.
I visualize a sweet old couple, married for half a century or so, looking forward to getting their monthly SS disbursements. .
Thus SS and Sex....
I kinda like the little as is, the thread has taken some interesting side tours but if the mod/admin feel it should be changed by all means do so. It's good to know however that judging by the number of posters sex wins over wine. All is well at ER.org
I dunno about that but the two certainly seem to make a fine combination.People love to wine about sex.