ladelfina
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2005
- Messages
- 2,713
A given life-sustaining or life-prolonging procedure has more to offer the younger the patient since the number of survival year reclaimed is greater. Furthermore, patient values change predictably with age, favoring comfort and dignity over raw survival
Hmmm - what if it's you?? How does one make a rational decision between:
If you're wrong(the doc) - you're sorry and I'm dead or
If I do this I'm guaranteed X more years at Y quality of life.
Sort of like my forum joke about living to precisely 84.6 because I read it in an IRS distribution table back in the 90's.
heh heh heh - I don't think the question can be answered - you place your bet and take your chances. .
What is the downside of being dead?
Hmmm - what if it's you?? How does one make a rational decision between:
Is it possible to check into a hospice and starve oneself (with painkiller assistance) at age 80 or so, without a terminal illness?