The thread "My Broker Recommendation" prompted me to find this story in the New Yorker magazine from last Fall. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/09/how-the-elderly-lose-their-rights.
The New Yorker story details the shenanigans of a so-called guardian in Nevada who unilaterally took over the lives and finances of an elderly couple (mid to late 60's so not THAT elderly) all under the premise they did have sufficient capability to live alone. Note, Nevada is not unique with their guardian provisions. According to the article, new rules are suppose to go into place this year.
The guardian actions were all done legally with the authority of the court and assistance of legal authorities. The daughter who lived in the area could not even find her period for a period. She had to fight tooth and nail to recover her parents from an assisted living facility where they were placed by the guardian for their own well being. The daughter was dismissed by the guardian has just too busy to properly attend to her parents. This story will make your blood boil.
I started to post the link in the above Broker Recommendation thread started by a guardian who was looking for advice on what the board pretty much confirmed as pretty shoddy advice. The OP in the original thread is clearly is far, far superior to the person profiled in the New Yorker story. I certainly did not want to taint his efforts to do the right thing. I hope that guardian will post to provide more insight to the nature of guardian powers.
One lesson from this story fore me is for each of us to have provisions for someone of YOUR choosing to be a guardian if the need arrives. There are many sharks out there and as the aging boomer population expands, the opportunities to defraud seniors will attract more and more slimy opportunists to take seniors' resources and hide them away.
The New Yorker story details the shenanigans of a so-called guardian in Nevada who unilaterally took over the lives and finances of an elderly couple (mid to late 60's so not THAT elderly) all under the premise they did have sufficient capability to live alone. Note, Nevada is not unique with their guardian provisions. According to the article, new rules are suppose to go into place this year.
The guardian actions were all done legally with the authority of the court and assistance of legal authorities. The daughter who lived in the area could not even find her period for a period. She had to fight tooth and nail to recover her parents from an assisted living facility where they were placed by the guardian for their own well being. The daughter was dismissed by the guardian has just too busy to properly attend to her parents. This story will make your blood boil.
I started to post the link in the above Broker Recommendation thread started by a guardian who was looking for advice on what the board pretty much confirmed as pretty shoddy advice. The OP in the original thread is clearly is far, far superior to the person profiled in the New Yorker story. I certainly did not want to taint his efforts to do the right thing. I hope that guardian will post to provide more insight to the nature of guardian powers.
One lesson from this story fore me is for each of us to have provisions for someone of YOUR choosing to be a guardian if the need arrives. There are many sharks out there and as the aging boomer population expands, the opportunities to defraud seniors will attract more and more slimy opportunists to take seniors' resources and hide them away.