I think WWE is sad even with the fans.
A friend sent me this link. The site appears to be factual but I can’t fully vouch for it. [MOD NOTE - Shows COVID-19 reproduction numbers for each state over time]
https://rt.live/?fbclid=IwAR0hQymjJc9DFqZIK7d0VQUJmKvQ090mHIgyuI3gbIu9O42CzT5l4KE_Li8
Unfortunately, most of the models used to make COVID-19 projections were not built to incorporate uncertain data, nor were they capable of spitting out answers with varying degrees of uncertainty. And while I suspect the people building said models realized this shortcoming, the majority of the press is not really mathematically or scientifically literate enough to point this out in their reporting. The result was a false sense of certainty, based on the models. I should emphasize that the models were off target not because the people who made them are ignorant or incompetent, but because we had little to no viable data to put into the models to begin with. We didn’t have several months to painstakingly count the squirrels. We didn’t even have a method for counting them. The best we could do was make guesses about squirrels, which we had never seen before, based on our understanding of bunnies and mice.
Testing broadly, especially asymptomatic people, to better estimate the true fatality rate is an essential part of any strategy to move forward. Doing so, especially if we can add more elaborate tools for contact tracing, can give us real data on the most important properties of the virus: how rapidly it spreads and how harmful it is to all people, not just the ones we already know about. And that data, in turn, will help us build better and more accurate models.
The mistake was not taking the timeout. The mistake was not using our timeout to better understand our opponent. We failed to scale up testing and gather the essential information outlined here that would have helped us create better, more nuanced and hopefully more accurate models, rather than having to essentially guess at our data inputs (and hence at the outcomes). Now, six weeks later, we are still in the dark because we didn’t do the broad testing that we should have done back then. We still don’t know fully how many people contract this virus and come out relatively unscathed.
Very amusing and very true.Peter Attia looks at the models for CV19.
Emphasis added by yours truly.
https://peterattiamd.com/covid-19-whats-wrong-with-the-models/
Peter Attia looks at the models for CV19.
Emphasis added by yours truly.
https://peterattiamd.com/covid-19-whats-wrong-with-the-models/
You expressed the unfairness of this before. Assuming that the absolute number of tests possible in a day is limited, then it makes sense to spend the testing where it can determine management, i.e. prisoners can be released, but how do you release nursing home residents? What would you do differently if you could test positive a nursing home resident?Cases are up mainly because of a spike in prisons. Over 73% at one state prison tested positive, including some staff. I'm sure that if they ever started widespread testing in nursing homes, we'd see much the same. Why the prisons are considered more important, I don't know. Lawbreakers appear to rate higher than the elderly. Unless it's an elderly lawbreaker. The governor is considering releasing more prisoners.
Georgia just announced they are reopening their state as of Friday.
https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/ke...sses-to-reopen-in-georgia-amid-covid-19-fight
No surprise, really. I could see this coming weeks ago, as did many others here.This will be difficult. Your average politician will be looking to pass the buck with respect to reopening decisions to avoid being blamed when any subsequent uptick in infection rate occurs.
Can’t make this stuff up. Direct quote from the article:
“Given the favorable data, Kemp said that gyms, fitness centers, bowling alleys, beauty shops and salons, barbershops, body art studios, and more would be able to open Friday, April 24.
Kemp said the reopening of these businesses "would not be business-as-usual" and would require companies to implement changes to ensure sanitation mandates and social distancing.”
What could possibly go wrong? I mean it's not like any of these businesses have to touch all their customers in order to do business.
You expressed the unfairness of this before. Assuming that the absolute number of tests possible in a day is limited, then it makes sense to spend the testing where it can determine management, i.e. prisoners can be released, but how do you release nursing home residents? What would you do differently if you could test positive a nursing home resident?
With nursing homes, if one resident or staff is positive, then you can assume all staff and residents have been exposed since inadequate PPE is par for course.
Encouraging news about antibody testing and results. Saw a few news reports, had the family and patients interviewed, so it's legit. Desperately ill and elderly patients recovering.
Can’t make this stuff up. Direct quote from the article:
“Given the favorable data, Kemp said that gyms, fitness centers, bowling alleys, beauty shops and salons, barbershops, body art studios, and more would be able to open Friday, April 24.
Kemp said the reopening of these businesses "would not be business-as-usual" and would require companies to implement changes to ensure sanitation mandates and social distancing.”
Can’t make this stuff up. Direct quote from the article:
“Given the favorable data, Kemp said that gyms, fitness centers, bowling alleys, beauty shops and salons, barbershops, body art studios, and more would be able to open Friday, April 24.
Kemp said the reopening of these businesses "would not be business-as-usual" and would require companies to implement changes to ensure sanitation mandates and social distancing.”
What favorable data?