Andre1969
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
As long as it is not greed, lust, or gluttony, I think you will be OK in the sin area!
So, Golden Corall is out, for dinner?
As long as it is not greed, lust, or gluttony, I think you will be OK in the sin area!
Very true... My last daily driver had 717 factory hp but it would surely be considered a muscle car today. Muscle cars of the late 60's were pushing about 425/435 factory hp. (ex 426/427 cu in engines). Gas mileage now on my last car was ~21mpg on the highway. Back then is was about half of that, IIRC.That's the nice thing about some daily driver cars today...they have just as much or more power than muscle cars of the past.
My 2015 Acura has 290 HP, more than a Firebird Formula 350. It also gets 35 mpg on the highway.
Very true... My last daily driver had 717 factory hp but it would surely be considered a muscle car today. Muscle cars of the late 60's were pushing about 425/435 factory hp. (ex 426/427 cu in engines). Gas mileage now on my last car was ~21mpg on the highway. Back then is was about half of that, IIRC.
I did not know my 5.9 Cummins ISB with common rail fuel injection had a rev limiter.Yeah, since my early 20s, I've rarely gotten close to a red line nor worried too much about "power" and "torque" figures as long as the vehicle will do what I want it to do.
Every once in a while (like when a light turns yellow) I'll "punch it" and say "Flog those hamsters!"
Other than that, I'm becoming more and more clueless on specs. Heh, heh, I'm probably more interested in the MPG than the HP, etc. YMMV
Oh, and I once owned a Corvette with the small block 350/350/4spd. No, I don't remember the RPM at peak torque and HP. It was getting up there for the HP though.
IIRC, all you said is true... No doubt how they measure HP has had some variability in the last 50+ years. SAE, gross, net, certified, brake, flywheeel, rear wheel, etc. (Sort of like measuring and comparing Net Worth around here ) Also, back in the day, some understated their real HP for insurance reasons. Z28's comes to mind. Grossly understated back in the day.And not only that, but in the "good old days" they rated them in gross hp. And sometimes those numbers were some pretty "gross" exaggerations!
I've heard some sources say the 426 Hemi put out around 350 hp net, although I've heard others say it really did put out around 425 hp. But it was supposedly one of the more realistically-rated engines.
I don't know if there's any truth to it, but I've heard that Mopar tended to under-rate their engines a bit, whereas GM was more likely to exaggerate their hp. And Ford was somewhere in the middle.
All my life, I have been in the "financially challenged" situation. One thing I would love to have is to own an AMG SUV or a M sport SAV.
If one looks at this from pure financial prospective, it is really a bad idea. 100K sitting in a high yield account at 5% is making 5K a year. One 100K car sitting in the driveway will lose at least 10% every year, let alone needing insurance and maintenance costs. Currently, late model CPO does not offer much savings.
But if I don't get one now, I would probably never going to get one once I am retired. We only live once, is getting a nice car before retirement a really big sin?
Actually many of the 60s-early 70s high performance cars were underrated for insurance reasons. They made more hp than stated, not less. Sure the marketing folks wanted big numbers to compare to competition. Underrated also helped in racing with weight to hp ratios.And not only that, but in the "good old days" they rated them in gross hp. And sometimes those numbers were some pretty "gross" exaggerations!
I've heard some sources say the 426 Hemi put out around 350 hp net, although I've heard others say it really did put out around 425 hp. But it was supposedly one of the more realistically-rated engines.
I don't know if there's any truth to it, but I've heard that Mopar tended to under-rate their engines a bit, whereas GM was more likely to exaggerate their hp. And Ford was somewhere in the middle.
Yep the same guy that also said
Whiling walking a mile to the store under the noon sun. It hit me - if we are living this hard with a 6 figure salary and benefits, how could we manage without those in retirement? It is confirmed again when I have to cut the two week old grasses. I hate mowing the lawn and the mosquito bites.
To answer the OP's question, of course it's not a sin, what a weird way to look at it. Do what you want with your money if you can afford it and your partner's on board with your decision. Not to sound like a shrink but your head seems to be all over the place as to your priorities and finances.
As long as it is not greed, lust, or gluttony, I think you will be OK in the sin area!
Same story for me, only a 2013 MB S550, purchased in May of 2016.I can relate to your question.
In 2021, I bought a certified pre-owned BMW.
I saw high inflation coming many years ago.
The value of the money saved would be reduced before my eyes.
I enjoy driving and owning an ultimate driving machine was on my life to do list.
Fast forward more than two years later, I am happy with the decision. The same car costs more now, even with higher mileage. It doesn't mean I earn money. It was not an investment in the first place. Had I not bought it, I may not have bought it ever since the price got higher and higher.
Every time I drive the car, I feel good. Listening to the engine roaring to gain traction from 0 to 60 mph is a beautiful music in my ears.
If you can buy a luxury car without breaking the bank and it is what you want, by all means go for it.
Same story for me, only a 2013 MB S550, purchased in May of 2016.
I love the stupid car.