Spend it or Save it?

If government gave you money to stimulate the economy, how would you spend it?

  • Retired - Spend it

    Votes: 22 13.8%

  • Retired - Save it

    Votes: 44 27.5%

  • Retired - Pay down debt

    Votes: 4 2.5%

  • Not Retired - Spend it

    Votes: 8 5.0%

  • Not Retired - Save it

    Votes: 69 43.1%

  • Not Retired - Pay down debt

    Votes: 13 8.1%
  • Total voters
    160
Save it. Either for ourselves, or as a contribution to DD's IRA account for her. See the poll is hugely voting for "save"---I wouldn't have expected anything else from the ER members! :)
 
I would have to support my country and buy a HDTV for my office, a XBOX360, PS3, and Mass Effect.

/waves flag!
 
Bigritchie said:
I would have to support my country and buy a HDTV for my office, a XBOX360, PS3, and Mass Effect.

/waves flag!
Click to expand...

That's the spirit!

Sorta brings a tear to yer eye, eh? Cue the Kate Smith... :p

I voted "save it"...
 
When things get tough, REAL Americans go shopping! ;)
 
I voted save it, which is why, economy wise, I think it is more likely to have an effect if it was targeted to low income folks who are more likely to spend it, even if it might only be to put off the day they default on their mortgage
 
I saw some analysis which indicates that typically when Americans get $1.00 in a stimulus package they spend about $1.40 of it, because it increases their "confidence" even when they know it's a one time boon. Not sure where they find the other $0.40 since tapping home equity would seem out of the question this time around. In any case, it tells me that my response is not what the government is looking for. I think of it like an unexpected bonus in my paycheck. If I didn't have the expense before, the act of getting the bonus doesn't change my expense plan. If I find money, I put it towards investments for FIRE. Maybe after I reach FI my response would change.
 
I will send my rebate back to the United States Treasury to satisfy part my 2008 Estimated Tax Payments.
 
So far, only 20% would spend it. I hope the government isn't counting on this board to stoke the economy!
 
I would save it....allocate it to my Roth IRA for 2008.
 
I hear there will be an income cut-off of about $110k/joint return. Does anybody have any info on income limits?
 
RockOn said:
I hear there will be an income cut-off of about $110k/joint return. Does anybody have any info on income limits?
Click to expand...

The White House would like to see the rebate go to everyone who filed an income tax return and paid taxes. This would include taxpayers in higher income brackets. The Democrats, however, would like to see everyone who filed an income tax return receive a rebate, regardless of whether they paid little or no taxes. This would mean there would have to be a ceiling on income to subsidize the low income people. Some Democrats have suggested that couples earning more than $85,000 would not qualify for the tax rebate, while others wish to place the maximum at $110,000.
washingtonpost.com
 
Maybe I should do with it what we did with the last one--had a big party with our whole hippie neighborhood and bought some, ahem, "smoking supplies" along with lots of liquor! But that was more supporting the underground economy than the "real" one. Ask HFWR, he'll know what I'm talking about. ;)

Ah, but times have changed, perhaps we'll put it towards some porch furniture instead. Sigh.
 
Sarah in SC said:
Maybe I should do with it what we did with the last one--had a big party with our whole hippie neighborhood and bought some, ahem, "smoking supplies" along with lots of liquor! But that was more supporting the underground economy than the "real" one. Ask HFWR, he'll know what I'm talking about. ;)

Ah, but times have changed, perhaps we'll put it towards some porch furniture instead. Sigh.
Click to expand...

:angel:

Supply and demand...
 
growing_older said:
I saw some analysis which indicates that typically when Americans get $1.00 in a stimulus package they spend about $1.40 of it, because it increases their "confidence" even when they know it's a one time boon. Not sure where they find the other $0.40 since tapping home equity would seem out of the question this time around. In any case, it tells me that my response is not what the government is looking for. I think of it like an unexpected bonus in my paycheck. If I didn't have the expense before, the act of getting the bonus doesn't change my expense plan. If I find money, I put it towards investments for FIRE. Maybe after I reach FI my response would change.
Click to expand...

The only study I've seen mentioned said something different. It was a study of the 2001 or 2003 tax rebate program, and it said that approximately 2/3 of the money was spent within a few months.

Also, the WSJ said that higher income folks were more likely to save it, lower income folks were more likely to spend it, which explains the poll results here.

2Cor521
 
Driven by a nagging fear that our country will someday be run by someone responsible, I voted 'not retired - save it' on the premise that I might actually be on the hook to repay this borrowed money.

Amazing that people think a problem created in part by fiscal irresponsibility can be solved by more of the same!
 
Excellent point! Do people realize the govenment is once again 100% borrowing the funds to pay the rebate? I'll vote for you as president, please run.

fireby40 for 2008! Where do I send my contribution? How do I get involved?
 
Last edited:
fireby40 said:
Driven by a nagging fear that our country will someday be run by someone responsible, I voted 'not retired - save it' on the premise that I might actually be on the hook to repay this borrowed money.

Amazing that people think a problem created in part by fiscal irresponsibility can be solved by more of the same!
Click to expand...

That is why I believe the dow is headed for 8000.
 
I'd like to change my vote.

It turns out that my son[-]'s doctor's children's college fund[/-] requires an adenoidectomy. After insurance pays, and subtracting off my former wife's portion, what's left over comes to...you guessed it...$800. Not that I mind...the kid has problems that the surgery should help.

Anyway, not sure if I'm proud that I'm helping the economy out of a recession or ashamed that I'm contributing to the high cost of health care.

2Cor521
 
Uh-oh, so does this mean that we might have to spend the $800 to help our country get out of a recession?

Guess I had better start shifting into consumer mode... :D
 
RockOn said:
Excellent point! Do people realize the govenment is once again 100% borrowing the funds to pay the rebate? I'll vote for you as president, please run.

fireby40 for 2008! Where do I send my contribution? How do I get involved?
Click to expand...

What pisses me off is that the federal reserve creates this money backed by nothing out of thin air, then loans it to our government which then pays it back with interest, and has to tax us to get that interest.
 
OK, my bud says the original amount proposed was around $1800 to be rebated to the people who actually pay taxes, but the whiney (I thought better of the term I originally used here and removed it because I don't want to become known as an antagonist) types pizzed & moaned so now EVERYBODY, even those who pay no taxes will get some, meaning the amount will now be maybe $250. I realize he probably is a little off on the actual numbers, but is that basically the gist of the deal? Who believes people that don't pay taxes are entitled to get MY money back? Flame away!>:D
 
Last edited:
Helicopter Ben cannot tell who is looking up to the sky with their butterfly nets.
 
Retire Soon said:
The White House would like to see the rebate go to everyone who filed an income tax return and paid taxes. This would include taxpayers in higher income brackets. The Democrats, however, would like to see everyone who filed an income tax return receive a rebate, regardless of whether they paid little or no taxes. This would mean there would have to be a ceiling on income to subsidize the low income people. Some Democrats have suggested that couples earning more than $85,000 would not qualify for the tax rebate, while others wish to place the maximum at $110,000.
washingtonpost.com - nation, world, technology and Washington area news and headlines
Click to expand...

If I'd looked a little harder, I'd have seen the above quoted post before I posted my previous post.....lol! However, I stand by the principle that those who pay the taxes should get the rebate.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

street
With markets higher than any time in history
4 5 6
PlayinwithFIRE
P
B
Relative asking for my bank account number . . .
2 3
albireo13
A
Midpack
  • Locked
  • Poll
Are You Planning on a Soc Sec Haircut?
2
Midpack
Midpack
A
What if?
Sue J
S
Still Learning
New Vanguard Tax Statement On Sells
RetMD21
R

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom