Andre1969
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Looks like the Taurus, once it hits about 4-5 years old, is roughly average in reliability. Nothing stellar, but nothing horrible. FWIW I think they got most of the serious kinks worked out of the Taurus back in later part of the 1986-95 generation. The 3.8 V-6 has always been famouns for blowing head gaskets. And it still does to this day...often happens around 80-90,000 miles. The 4-speed automatic transmission was troublesome too, but EVERY auto maker had trouble when they first came out with a 4-speed overdrive automatic, whether it was RWD or FWD. Some just had a quicker learning curve and got the bugs worked out more quickly. And as I recall, the Taurus was Ford's first use of a FWD 4-speed automatic tranny.
The models with the 3.0 V-6, which is a totally different design from the old 3.8, aren't too bad. That 3.0 gave way to a 2.5 DOHC version used in cars like the Contour/Mystique and a 3.0 DOHC version for the Taurus. The pushrod version is a bit crude and underpowered, but gets the job done, but the OHC version is better. Smoother, stronger, and a bit more economical.
If you just want a cheap workhorse and don't care about status, I don't think a Taurus would be too bad of a choice. Just don't get one that's been ragged out by its previous owner.
The models with the 3.0 V-6, which is a totally different design from the old 3.8, aren't too bad. That 3.0 gave way to a 2.5 DOHC version used in cars like the Contour/Mystique and a 3.0 DOHC version for the Taurus. The pushrod version is a bit crude and underpowered, but gets the job done, but the OHC version is better. Smoother, stronger, and a bit more economical.
If you just want a cheap workhorse and don't care about status, I don't think a Taurus would be too bad of a choice. Just don't get one that's been ragged out by its previous owner.