brewer12345
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2003
- Messages
- 18,085
Until the mods grow a pair and get out the blow torch and nipple clamps, please don't feed the effig trolls!
I think if more people just used the ignore function as needed the problem would be solved. We can't always look to someone else to solve our problem cause it may just be our problem.
So is this forum open to all, or isn't it?
Reminds me of someone from personnel who called me into her office one day. While I was waiting, her boss took a call right behind my ear, and said significantly, "we will not blacklist anyone." Fastforward a few months, my new dept. was having lunch, my boss took me aside and said, "see that guy over there, he's retiring and not telling anyone why; do you know who he is?" I said yeah, he's the head of personnel and they probably didn't tell him why. So is this forum open to all, or isn't it?
Until the mods grow a pair and get out the blow torch and nipple clamps, please don't feed the effig trolls!
If you are too wet behind the ears to understand why RWJ and h05uc are persona non grata most anywhere on the web, I don't have the patience to 'splain it to you. Take a look at the hocomania section on intercst's board if you want to know the details.
Hey, we can watch the real hocomaniac comment on this thread from his hocoasylum:
Retire Early Home Page - Dividend Stocks
No, it's not open to all. In the words of Gene Hackman from the movie "Crimson Tide", "We're here to defend democracy, not practice it."So is this forum open to all, or isn't it?
The theme could be "Look at me!" or "My blog needs traffic!" or "My way is better and I would never ever do it that way" or "The sky is falling!!!" or "You're all messed up and I'm going to raise a ruckus here" or "You've been here a while but you're not so special" or some other [-]obsessive[/-] favorite subject.
Fair enough. I think my record speaks for itself.Yeah, I know the type. The constant refrain of "who's afraid of volatility, let's go 100% stocks!"
Let the non-sinners start casting stones!
If that's directed at me then let me point out that it's a non-profit project with author's royalties (if any) going to military charities. It's not about the money and IMO it really reduces an author's credibility to give early-retirement advice in exchange for royalties.Or even worse are those who use this site to profit by using the material in a book they might be writing.
If you're impugning other authors who've posted here, let me point out that their man-hours of effort (writing, editing, & marketing) for their royalties work out to an hourly rate that's far below the minimum wage.
Stop putting words in my mouth.So, we should allow ***** to post on that basis?
So, we should allow ***** to post on that basis?
I think you add color to the board, Nords. I like that. I also liked the color SG added, OAP, and others. Even JWR's "color" is somewhat entertaining.
The insane and criminals I could do without, but I like color.
Unbelievable. Where's Andy or the mods with the boiling pitch and feathers when you need them?
We were out plucking the birds first
Takes a LOT of feathers to do a thorough job.
We were out plucking the birds first
Takes a LOT of feathers to do a thorough job.
5+ years of trolling.What am I missing?
The authors of the plug and its primary response are partners well known by those here when we had to exercise our first (and for years, only) banning of someone.I didn't read much of the post/thread that started all this. I thought it was a plug for dividend growth investing. I think DG investing is a reasonable option and nobody jumps on Cycling_investor for advocating it.
What am I missing?