help with new car buying decisoin

merlin3942

Recycles dryer sheets
Joined
Jun 9, 2014
Messages
67
I'm about ready for my once-every-15-year new car buy. I currently am driving my 1999 Mazda protege (just past 252K miles on it), and it needs a new catalytic converter ... which I don't think I want to pay for at this point. Besides, it's not a comfortable car for road trips (fine for the daily work commute), but since I'll be ER'ing in about 3 months, and plan to do some traveling, I want something a bit more comfortable.

My first thought is a "mini SUV", because it looks like they are easier to get in to/out of for me than "lower-to-the-ground" cars. I've been researching the Subaru Forester, the Mazda CX-5, and the Honda CRV. I really like the Forester, but am disappointed that it doesn't have "blind spot warning" technology, which I really think I'd like in my next car. I would consider the Subaru Outback - it's really a wagon, but looks similar to the Forester, but may not sit as high.

Anyone have any experience with owning any of the models mentioned, and if so, any thoughts about any of them (or other similar choices) you'd care to share?

Thanks!
 
Had a Honda CRV for 10 years, held up well, it's always highly rated for a reason.
 
I have a 2016 Forester. I like it a lot and have no regrets. The Forester seems to do really well with professional reviewers online and in print. My understanding is that the 4 wheel drive is great but it hasn't snowed by me yet so I don't know. Yes you are right though, if blind spot technology is important to cross the Subaru off your list; it's not offered.
I've also read great things about the Mazda in terms of handling and comfort and driving experience. If I lived in a place with no snow, I would have been more interested in the Mazda.
 
+1 on the Foz, my daily is a 2009 FXT and my wife has a 2013 FXT

Before that my daily was a 2004 FXT and my wife drove a 2002 Forester L

Before that my daily was a 1999 Forester L and before that my daily was a 2002 WRX, then I started racing it.

One thing about Foresters, they don't have blind spots - you can see all the way around

Put some snow tires on them they are bulletproof. Plus, they hold a crap ton of cargo, I've moved pinball machines in mine.


You guys think I may be biased on Foresters? :eek:
 
Last edited:
I recall that a few years ago, the author Daniel Pinkerton, who was a big guy, was looking for a car that was easy to get in and out of. He lurked in parking lots and came to the conclusion that the VW Beetle best fit the bill. I think it even comes with blind spot detection. YMMV

DW loves her CRV, but vision to the rear is somewhat compromised by the D pillars.
 
I recall that a few years ago, the author Daniel Pinkerton, who was a big guy, was looking for a car that was easy to get in and out of. He lurked in parking lots and came to the conclusion that the VW Beetle best fit the bill. I think it even comes with blind spot detection. YMMV

DW loves her CRV, but vision to the rear is somewhat compromised by the D pillars.

I'm 6'2" 260 and have no issues whatsoever comfortably driving in subarus.
 
OP - don't the new foresters have "eyesight"

My understanding is that while EyeSight gives you forward collision avoidance and lane departure warning, it doesn't have blind spot warning ... and that's what I think I need, since as I've gotten older, I find that I sometimes have a hard time physically turning my head/neck to look back out of the rear/side windows when changing lanes.
 
I'm 6'2" 260 and have no issues whatsoever comfortably driving in subarus.

how old are you? I ask because I'm quite a bit smaller than you, 5'10", 175 lbs and I find my wife's 96 Outback unbearably uncomfortable after about 30 minutes.

Specifically, I think the problem I have is that the gas pedal lines up with my navel, not my right hip, so my rt leg is an awkward angle.

I'm 62. Each of my kids has newer model Outbacks, and they are an improvement, but still not great for me.

I am really happy with the Highlander I just bought, but set me back 40K, which I did not love.
 
how old are you? I ask because I'm quite a bit smaller than you, 5'10", 175 lbs and I find my wife's 96 Outback unbearably uncomfortable after about 30 minutes.

Specifically, I think the problem I have is that the gas pedal lines up with my navel, not my right hip, so my rt leg is an awkward angle.

I'm 62. Each of my kids has newer model Outbacks, and they are an improvement, but still not great for me.

I am really happy with the Highlander I just bought, but set me back 40K, which I did not love.

52 - just to qualify this I've never driven a 96 outback


Outbacks are built on the legacy chassis, which I don't find as comfortable as the impreza chassis which is what the Forester is based on


My mom has a 2005 leggy and it isn't nearly as comfortable as my Dad's 2013 Forester 2.5i touring, or any of the other foresters I've owned


geez we all have subarus
 
Last edited:
My understanding is that while EyeSight gives you forward collision avoidance and lane departure warning, it doesn't have blind spot warning ... and that's what I think I need, since as I've gotten older, I find that I sometimes have a hard time physically turning my head/neck to look back out of the rear/side windows when changing lanes.

yes, it appears eyesight is a forward-facing system
 
Be sure to do a long test drive of any vehicle you buy. The sight lines of many new vehicles can cause problems. I too have limited neck mobility.We bought a new Nissan Altima 3 years ago. It's been a wonderful car for us with one exception..the sight lines. Even if I crank my neck, (which hurts) I don't feel I see as much as I would like to. We upgraded our tech package to include blindspot warning and back-up camera, which is an optional package. At least once a month I think to myself without this camera I'd feel completely adrift trying to back-up this car. Even my husband who has driven farm machinery since he was a young boy and can backup anything, anywhere has taken to looking for parking spots that are "back-up" friendly. A lot of new vehicles have this issue so explore all driving conditions to be sure you are satisfied with the one you purchase.
 
Currently driving my third CR-V because I love them. I think a huge factor in choosing a car is how comfortable you are in the seat, and the CR-V has the most comfortable seats (for me) I have ever used. I can easily go 5-6 hours on a trip with no need to stretch my legs and unwind (well, assuming my bladder cooperates).

As for blind spots, I believe most cars can have the side mirrors adjusted to practically eliminate blind spots.

http://www.cartalk.com/sites/default/files/features/mirrors/CarTalkMirrors.pdf
 
Be sure to do a long test drive of any vehicle you buy. The sight lines of many new vehicles can cause problems. ...

Thanks to everyone for all the great advice! Things have changed a lot over the past 15 years. I drive rentals a few times a year when I'm on business trips, and a few years ago, I couldn't figure out how to start the car ... it was one of those "keyless" push button models. Felt like an idiot having to go back to the rental counter to ask for assistance .... :facepalm: But I've noticed more and more that the "lines" of the newer cars are not very friendly as far as trying to look out to the rear and side ... they almost HAD to invent "blind spot warning" to compensate for that. I've heard that the Forester has good sight lines all around ... as long as you can turn your head! ;-) THe Outback wagon does offer blind spot warning ... but it doesn't sit as high off the ground, so I'll have to see if it's much more difficult for me to get in/out of.
 
Yes the Forester has a forward collision system called "eye site". The lane departure works well but some may find it annoying with its beeps and dash warnings. The obstacle avoidance and braking has given me false indications with dips in the road and cars coming into my lane. But that one time you need it you'll be glad it's there. You can shut it off but why? Heck I paid for it, I'm using it!
 
+1 Honda CRV. The blind spot may be an issue, but I actually like the captains chairs as I find it easier to turn and look.. had back surgery and this vehicle was one of the few that I didn't have issues with turning and twisting in and sitting for long periods. It road higher so I could see better which also helped.
 
Not sure where I read it, but the poor visibility of modern cars can be attributed to the need to meet safety standards for collision absorption. Mentioned how the days of driving with window down and arm out the window are over; need more car between you and the t-bone inclined drivers.
 
+1 on the Foz, my daily is a 2009 FXT and my wife has a 2013 FXT

Before that my daily was a 2004 FXT and my wife drove a 2002 Forester L

Before that my daily was a 1999 Forester L and before that my daily was a 2002 WRX, then I started racing it.

One thing about Foresters, they don't have blind spots - you can see all the way around

Put some snow tires on them they are bulletproof. Plus, they hold a crap ton of cargo, I've moved pinball machines in mine.


You guys think I may be biased on Foresters? :eek:



Every car has a blind spot.... the question is how big and what can you do to minimize it...
 
We have a 2016 Outlook 2.5i Limited with about 3k miles. Love it so far. Blind spot detection is standard with the Limited trim. I would think that the Forrester has It as well. The Outback rides nicer than the Forrester due to its longer wheelbase so I think it would be more comfortable for traveling.
 
Last edited:
We have a 2016 Outlook 2.5i Limited with about 3k miles. Love it so far. Blind spot detection is standard with the Limited trim. I would think that the Forrester has It as well. The Outback rides nicer than the Forrester due to its longer wheelbase so I think it would be more comfortable for traveling.

I've never driven the newer outbacks (2009+) but have ridden as a passenger. They are comfortable. I've driven my wife's FXT on a 2000 mile round trip and it was awesome.

OP: one thing to consider regarding ride height, with spacers on top of the struts or aftermarket springs you can lift the car about 2" I believe without rubbing issues. I lifted my forester 2" (because ski rig) but I'm not sure about the legacy chassis.
 
Back
Top Bottom