street
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2016
- Messages
- 9,613
^ Wow!! Thanks for that history.
[MOD EDIT]
[MOD EDIT]
Last edited by a moderator:
Horrible that the refs decided the game in favor of Bucs. No call on multiple holds commited by the Bucs but they call one to decide the game against the Packers. Horrible finish. At least be consistant.
Looks like Budweiser won’t be airing SB ads this year in favor of directing funds toward vaccine rollout efforts. Good for them although I usually enjoyed the spots.
I still have an ancient tee with the frogs croaking “Bud” “Weis” “Er”. Loved it!
Coke, Pepsi and Hyandai aren't running ads this year either - though the halftime show is sponsored by Pepsi. Guess it will be nothing but GoDaddy ads (yuck)...Looks like Budweiser won’t be airing SB ads this year in favor of directing funds toward vaccine rollout efforts. Good for them although I usually enjoyed the spots.
I still have an ancient tee with the frogs croaking “Bud” “Weis” “Er”. Loved it!
One of those decisions that fans will say was bad either way. I think they should have gone for the TD but if they did and didn't convert then people would be saying THAT was a bad decision. Regardless, the players win or lose the game and the Packers had their chances and couldn't finish.
ESPN’s analytics department said the disparity was not large, but going for it on fourth down and subsequently trying for the two-point conversion would have given the Packers roughly a 0.5% greater chance of winning the game than kicking the field goal and taking the chance that they would get another possession and score a touchdown. EdjSports, another fine analytics outfit, said that the decision cost Green Bay 3% pre-snap in their Game Winning Chance model. And in fairness to LaFleur, at least one model showed the field goal as a slight edge, though it's unknown if that model took into account 1) Having Aaron Rodgers and 2) Giving the ball to Tom Brady.
Regardless of what the numbers say, there seemed to be palpable pain and resentment for having the ball taken out of his [Rodgers'] hands. The long-term damage will be more difficult to quantify.
I though the whole point of American Football was the beer commercial that has nothing to do with beer.
Sour grapes aaron. One INT the defender was all over TB and instead of taking the sack he heaved it up as a jump ball and it was way short. One INT was off of Godwin's hands but was a good pass. One INT was a poor pass. But two of the TD passes were excellent.
Sports Illustrated has an article with percentages about the call. To go for it on 4th down vs field goal and try to get a stop and score again.
https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/01/25/m...ook&utm_medium=news_tab&utm_content=algorithm
The opportunity was set up for a Hoosier's type moment with Rodgers playing the part of Jimmy Chitwood, but LaFleur never gave him the chance.
...For instance, there were a couple of time Rodgers could have run with the ball near the goal line and didn't. ...
.... That dive was soccer worthy. This is not football. These guys have such agility, but they feel someone grab their hand towel and dive, after the ball is obviously out of reach, so nothing to lose? Blah. Call it conspiracy. I call it crap. ...
You can believe me or not, but at the time I was really puzzled at the FG decision, and still am. Even if they miss the 2 pt conversion they would just need a FG to win, which would be more likely in the little time remaining in the best case to get the ball back.
I thought so too at first, but after seeing the replay, his jersey was held for about 5 steps... which slowed the receiver enough that he wasn't near where the ball end up... but I agree the receiver embellished foul to get the ref's attention.
Coke, Pepsi and Hyandai aren't running ads this year either - though the halftime show is sponsored by Pepsi. Guess it will be nothing but GoDaddy ads (yuck)...
This is kinda outrageous anyway "Thirty-second ad spots for the Super Bowl reportedly go for about $55 million a piece." Ultimately customers are footing these costs.
https://nypost.com/2021/01/25/budweiser-to-pass-on-super-bowl-commercials-this-year/
CBS, which owns the television rights for Super Bowl 55, has sought $5.5 million for a 30-second spot during this year's broadcast, according to multiple reports.
Hey what possible difference could $49.5 million make.Just to clarify, the NY Post article was wrong. The 30 second ad spots are going for $5.5M, not $55M. Still an absurd amount, but not quite as bad. The article the NY Post linked to was a USA Today story, and the Post just dropped the decimal point.
^^^^ From October 19th...Wouldn't it be great to see the new Brady Bunch make it to the playoffs (or dare I say even the SB)...
So the Super Bowl is set.
The last 2 QBs to win the SB going against each other.
The last team the Bucs lost to this season? The Chiefs.
In addition...
The last #5 seed to win the SB? The 2007-2008 Giants.
The last team they lost to in the regular season? The New England Patriots.
The team they beat in the Super Bowl? The New England Patriots.
The Rod Serling vibe is heavy on this matchup...
Brady is amazing. He's 43 and plays like a 33 y/o on top of his game. Total team effort in this win tho.