Towns and Cities with Free Public Transportation

yup...”free” stuff provided by “the govt” usually is expensive.

You’ve made your point. Why not let the OP continue with her thread discussion.

To all - it’s not free, just no direct charge to the user. That’s been clarified, so why not get back on topic?
 
Last edited:
Came to this thread expecting a nice list of cities with "no fee" "fare-free" "zero-fare" public transportation I might utilize when traveling.

Instead found another contentious thread, this time debating the word "free."


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_public_transport

And this one for more limited zero fare local routes:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_free_public_transport_routes

Well, in defense of the "contention," this forum is somewhat curmudgeon central. :D

We did enjoy the free electric buses in Chattanooga a while back.

Now, get off my lawn!:LOL:
 
This is an interesting topic.

I am in the "it's not FREE" because people who do not use it are paying for other's to use it.

I've started to notice the very empty public buses that pass by and I read that the area is looking at going FREE for those that ride (but subsidized by those that do not.)

Then it hit me.....What is the cost to operate and would it be cheaper to give those few folks who ride the bus a free Uber pass? I think it's costing me/us/other people a lot to run those empty buses.

I think the math formula I need to do is "total passengers"/"total cost to operate the bus system after revenue" but for some reason, those statistics seem to be difficult to find.......shocking.

OP here in my town the municipal government looks closely at ridership and eliminates or reroutes bus routes that are underutilized. We have the opposite problem--many of our buses are too full. The main complaint I hear is that we do not have enough buses or routes to accommodate everyone who wants to ride.

As for the issue of my taxes "subsidizing" bus riders--I am in favor of that. The more people that ride the bus the better--less crowded roads and less pollution. Isn't that what taxes are all about--we pay taxes for government services that help the public as a whole even though we personally don't use the service. For example, I don't have children in school but gladly pay taxes so we can have good schools.
 
Nevermind free, many places have little, if any public transit.
 
yup...”free” stuff provided by “the govt” usually is expensive.

Ironic that you were employed by a 919 call center, weren't you paid by "the govt"? 919 calls are a great example of something provided by the government "free" that is a great benefit but I guess I could argue that I don't like "free" 919 calls because I have never had to call 919.
 
OP here in my town the municipal government looks closely at ridership and eliminates or reroutes bus routes that are underutilized. We have the opposite problem--many of our buses are too full. The main complaint I hear is that we do not have enough buses or routes to accommodate everyone who wants to ride.

As for the issue of my taxes "subsidizing" bus riders--I am in favor of that. The more people that ride the bus the better--less crowded roads and less pollution. Isn't that what taxes are all about--we pay taxes for government services that help the public as a whole even though we personally don't use the service. For example, I don't have children in school but gladly pay taxes so we can have good schools.

Hey harlee.....

I think we agree that the public bus and the public schools are good...I think we disagree on how much $$$ is enough. No worries.
 
Back on topic:

While not Fare-free, our small city has a very low cost bus system ($.50 under 62, $.25 if over). We don't use it (not convenient), but we have a friend who cannot drive anymore (had a stroke). He uses it often. It goes right past his house. He can go to the local grocery and local Walmart (or the casino). Sometimes he needs to change buses, but that's OK, he has plenty of time.

Most users are low income, or cannot drive, like our friend.

Serves a good purpose. Of course it is subsidized, but I think for the greater good.
 
Back Off Topic:

Check my math......I looked up the Asheville NC city bus statistics:

2,000,000 passengers a year
$10,200,000 annual funding from the govt

So that's $5.10 per passenger, right?

The fare is a buck, so that means it costs $6.10 for every passenger?

I looked up the average uber fare and the "internet" said 95 cents per mile.....That subsidy and fare for the bus, if given to uber, would carry the passenger almost 6.5 miles.

There ought to be a better way to get people to where they want to go instead of a government subsidized bus rolling down the road on the bus schedule. It appears to me to be inefficient.

Not sure what would work better but the economics of it create an opportunity......
 
Last edited:
Back Off Topic:

Check my math......I looked up the Asheville NC city bus statistics:

2,000,000 passengers a year
$10,200,000 annual funding from the govt

So that's $5.10 per passenger, right?

The fare is a buck, so that means it costs $6.10 for every passenger?

I looked up the average uber fare and the "internet" said 95 cents per mile.....That subsidy and fare for the bus, if given to uber, would carry the passenger almost 6.5 miles.

There ought to be a better way to get people to where they want to go instead of a government subsidized bus rolling down the road on the bus schedule. It appears to me to be inefficient.

Not sure what would work better but the economics of it create an opportunity......

I think that your stats show that the cost of government funding per passenger per year is around $5.10. These are annual costs without regard to distance traveled. You then say that this subsidy and the $1 fare would permit a passenger to take one 6.5 mile trip on Uber (which is a lot less than I have paid for shorter trips, but OK). I think that the better approach would be to look at passenger miles on the system but even looking at it your way, I'd say that a well used bus system comes out better.
I confess that I am a real fan of public transit and it is one of my highest priorities when I consider where to live in retirement. There will come a time when I should not be driving and I hope that public transit will be there so I can continue as many of my daily activities as possible. I love hearing about cities, especially smaller ones, that have robust transit, so thanks OP for the topic.

br
 
What country?

England. In Scotland it is over 60 so my wife’s sister in a town close to Edinburgh has had a bus pass for 6 years already. Like us she has a regular service stopping close to her house so now hardly uses her car at all. It’s certainly a good way to relieve city congestion when most seniors get the bus.
 
I don't use public transportation; it would take me 20-30 to get to transit station. In 30 minutes, I can be downtown in my own car/truck. My sister uses it to get to work, she lives a 5 minute walk from a station and leaves at 5:00 AM to get to work by 7:45 AM, she pays full fare with a quarterly pass. My brother uses it to get to work, he live 5-7 minutes by car, he get a "free" pass as it is a perk from his university research job.
 
I visited Denver about a decade ago and stayed downtown. I was impressed by the free trolley that went back and forth through the city, it made travel very easy and affordable. We were able to visit many places and businesses that we would not have even if we had our own car.
 
Hi all.

Years ago, former Mayor Gavin Newsom wanted free Muni (City and County of San Francisco transit system) for all. One of the reasons was that it is so hard to collect & process fares, especially the ones in cash; also boarding & transit time is much faster without fare payments. It didn’t happen.

After Gavin abandoned the City for Sacramento, (now late) Mayor Lee set up a system for permanent free Muni passes for seniors of “low to moderate” income. So now anyone over age 65 with income less than $86,200 (1-person household) qualifies. IIRC, Mayor Lee was responding to constant media coverage of the high cost of living and the departure of many seniors and lower-income residents. When it went into effect, he said he wanted seniors to stay.
 
Welcome back from your sabbatical. :)

Nine years between posts is a very long time...

Hello, mayor of the forum.

It’s like the old joke about the child who didn’t speak until he was 4-yrs.old. Said he had no complaints until then.

Nine years! Time flies when you’re enjoying not going to work.

:dance:
 
Melbourne, Australia has free public transportation in the Central Business District. In Madrid, Spain it's not free, but it is extremely cheap for seniors.
 
I have no idea if any of the places I frequent has free public transport. Actually, I'm pretty sure it's not. I never even consider public transportation, figuring it's too inconvenient. Last time I had to resort to it was back in the early 90s when my car was in the shop for 6 months. DC Metro area, lived in suburban VA and worked in suburban MD. I had to take a bus to the Metro, change trains in DC at Metro Center, train to Silver Spring MD, then a bus to the office. If I got really lucky I was able to catch an express bus and the commute was only 90 minutes, but 9 out of 10 times I got stuck on the local, which pushed it out to 2 hours. Each way. This for a trip that would take 30-45 minutes in my car.

So unless I had a bus that stopped within a block of me and took me pretty much right where I want to go, I'd never consider it. Free or not. Even retired my time has value.
 
You guys are just jealous because your towns don't have free public transportation. At least my tax money is going toward something that benefits me.

This would have been a godsend when it was my mother with 2 little girls and no car (until I was 16) and barely making it.
 
I don't know about free, but overall I would have to say on balance the public transportation in the USA is very lacking. It just isn't that good. It would take a whole lot of money that individual states don't seem to be able to find or willing to spend to fix it. One thing for is for sure, if a miracle happens, and we start the infrastructure required to build capable public transportation with real speed, it certainly won't be free to use.

I could be wrong, but it just seems like when most of our cities were built they didn't include public transportation in the planning.

The history of public transportation in US is actually quite interesting: https://www.vox.com/2015/5/7/8562007/streetcar-history-demise . It seems to me that what killed it was free market. If you look around the world public transportation that functions well is in most cases subsidized - I mean people get taxed to get it running.
 
Our youngest son went to Clemson (go Tigers!) for his doctorate. The university provides free bus service to the city. Here on LI our university provides overcrowding on our roads and houses with illegal apartments.
 
Last edited:
The history of public transportation in US is actually quite interesting: https://www.vox.com/2015/5/7/8562007/streetcar-history-demise . It seems to me that what killed it was free market. If you look around the world public transportation that functions well is in most cases subsidized - I mean people get taxed to get it running.

Even if someone came up with a brilliant plan that could be duplicated in a lot of cities to help fix the public transportation issue, you would have big money fighting it. Number one would be the automakers.
Also, the big airlines would fight it. Why would the automakers and airlines in this country be in favor of high speed train transportation? The answer is they wouldn't. It would hurt their business.
 
Last edited:
Even if someone came up with a brilliant plan that could be duplicated in a lot of cities to help fix the public transportation issue, you would have big money fighting it. Number one would be the automakers.
Also, the big airlines would fight it. Why would the automakers and airlines in this country be in favor of high speed train transportation? The answer is they wouldn't. It would hurt their business.

Well, yes of course. It's free market again. And a dash of corruption that kills whatever regulations are unfavorable to one group but pushes others. FCC and high speed internet is another good example of the unbelievable ****ery we have deal with in US when it comes to pretty much basic services. I am constantly reminded about it when I get off the plane in places like Myanmar and am able to purchase a temp SIM card that provides me with fast internet for a few $.

Having said that, Japan has an amazing system of high speed trains AND a whole bunch airlines that are somehow able to co-exist. I spent there 3 months last year and used both to move around. It all works seamlessly. As to the automakers; there are ways to deal with them. Either by imposing fees for driving in big cities (London, NY soon) or imposing insanely high taxes & fees (https://dollarsandsense.sg/no-nonsense-explanation-on-why-cars-in-singapore-are-so-expensive/)
 
Back
Top Bottom