harllee
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Next year my wife and I will officially become old fogies so will have bus passes for fare free travel over the whole country
What country?
Next year my wife and I will officially become old fogies so will have bus passes for fare free travel over the whole country
yup...”free” stuff provided by “the govt” usually is expensive.
Came to this thread expecting a nice list of cities with "no fee" "fare-free" "zero-fare" public transportation I might utilize when traveling.
Instead found another contentious thread, this time debating the word "free."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_public_transport
And this one for more limited zero fare local routes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_free_public_transport_routes
This is an interesting topic.
I am in the "it's not FREE" because people who do not use it are paying for other's to use it.
I've started to notice the very empty public buses that pass by and I read that the area is looking at going FREE for those that ride (but subsidized by those that do not.)
Then it hit me.....What is the cost to operate and would it be cheaper to give those few folks who ride the bus a free Uber pass? I think it's costing me/us/other people a lot to run those empty buses.
I think the math formula I need to do is "total passengers"/"total cost to operate the bus system after revenue" but for some reason, those statistics seem to be difficult to find.......shocking.
yup...”free” stuff provided by “the govt” usually is expensive.
OP here in my town the municipal government looks closely at ridership and eliminates or reroutes bus routes that are underutilized. We have the opposite problem--many of our buses are too full. The main complaint I hear is that we do not have enough buses or routes to accommodate everyone who wants to ride.
As for the issue of my taxes "subsidizing" bus riders--I am in favor of that. The more people that ride the bus the better--less crowded roads and less pollution. Isn't that what taxes are all about--we pay taxes for government services that help the public as a whole even though we personally don't use the service. For example, I don't have children in school but gladly pay taxes so we can have good schools.
Back Off Topic:
Check my math......I looked up the Asheville NC city bus statistics:
2,000,000 passengers a year
$10,200,000 annual funding from the govt
So that's $5.10 per passenger, right?
The fare is a buck, so that means it costs $6.10 for every passenger?
I looked up the average uber fare and the "internet" said 95 cents per mile.....That subsidy and fare for the bus, if given to uber, would carry the passenger almost 6.5 miles.
There ought to be a better way to get people to where they want to go instead of a government subsidized bus rolling down the road on the bus schedule. It appears to me to be inefficient.
Not sure what would work better but the economics of it create an opportunity......
What country?
Hi all.
Welcome back from your sabbatical.
Nine years between posts is a very long time...
You guys are just jealous because your towns don't have free public transportation. At least my tax money is going toward something that benefits me.
I don't know about free, but overall I would have to say on balance the public transportation in the USA is very lacking. It just isn't that good. It would take a whole lot of money that individual states don't seem to be able to find or willing to spend to fix it. One thing for is for sure, if a miracle happens, and we start the infrastructure required to build capable public transportation with real speed, it certainly won't be free to use.
I could be wrong, but it just seems like when most of our cities were built they didn't include public transportation in the planning.
The history of public transportation in US is actually quite interesting: https://www.vox.com/2015/5/7/8562007/streetcar-history-demise . It seems to me that what killed it was free market. If you look around the world public transportation that functions well is in most cases subsidized - I mean people get taxed to get it running.
Even if someone came up with a brilliant plan that could be duplicated in a lot of cities to help fix the public transportation issue, you would have big money fighting it. Number one would be the automakers.
Also, the big airlines would fight it. Why would the automakers and airlines in this country be in favor of high speed train transportation? The answer is they wouldn't. It would hurt their business.
Nine years! Time flies when you’re enjoying not going to work.